I recently wrote a post on Hevria that caused a bit of a stir. The point of the piece was to, in a more-clever-than-wise way, point out that both yeshiva and college fall short in terms of providing a true education to their students, and for very similar reasons.
As soon as the essay went online, I started getting responses. A lot of them were positive. A lot of them weren’t.
Now, it’s rarely fun and almost never productive to argue with people on the Internet. The notion that anyone is going to change their mind about anything from an Internet argument is laughable (even the people who say they’re open-minded are not going to change their minds on any substantial issue from a comments section debate). Nevertheless, I feel these rather stupid impulses that I imagine others might find familiar…a certain need to have the last word; a need to prove myself, even to strangers; a need to defend what I’ve said, as if my reputation or something else important is on the line.
So I began to engage with the critical comments. And when I did, I began to realize that the point of my article had been grossly misunderstood. Most of the “negative” comments were people who felt I was saying people shouldn’t attend college, an idea that obviously aroused some emotion in some of my readers.
But then, as the flow of comments dwindled over the next few days, the plot thickened. Though many did not like my criticisms of college, and told me so, not a single person seemed upset about or defended yeshiva from my criticism.
Which leads me to the question: Why?
As far as I see it, there are a few possibilities:
Let’s go through one by one.
And so, back to the original question. Why did no one defend yeshiva?
I’m not sure. But here’s a whimsical theory.
No one defended yeshiva because there is now a clear understanding in the religious world that any organization, institution, or individual merely participates in or reflect what is Good or True, but is never itself completely good or true. In the secular world, however, there is now no concept of participation in an abstract perfection; there is only the thing itself, flawed until perfected.
In other words, since there is no particular vision of what college is, at essence, all of its failings are major detractions; after all, the next criticism might demolish the whole thing altogether. We must explain, against every criticism, why it is still a worthwhile institution. Meanwhile, since the Yeshiva at heart has an essential identity fully integrated into the Jewish framework, focusing around Torah study and all its implications, no number of incidental failures can undermine its worth.
People don’t feel the need to defend yeshiva because yeshiva is Torah study and Torah study is not going anywhere. Sure, there is plenty of room for improvement, and this is widely (if not universally) acknowledged. But a criticism of the institution is not an existential threat to it; we can work to fix the yeshiva, but the yeshiva will always exist, as long as Jews do Jewish things. The Jewish society has a need for intensive Torah study, and that need will always draw the yeshiva into existence like a wick drawing oil to the flame. So when I say that yeshiva sure is expensive, a hundred readers smiled and nodded and went back to their business, because though the cost may irk them, it is merely a practical issue that prevents us from fulfilling our need for yeshiva more pleasantly and efficiently.
College, on the other hand, is not perceived in terms of the need it fulfills per se. Especially in its current form, it is very hard for anyone to say what exactly college is for. And if you can’t point at the need or purpose that is its sustaining core, any attack could be an existential threat. When I say college debt is ridiculous, there is some chance I might be encouraging people to avoid college or even, G-d forbid, to demolish it. This is possible because not many people really think of college in terms of what it’s for, why it’s necessary, or ultimately (as follows directly from those ways of thinking) what it is. And so, it must be defended.
All of which is kind of meta, since my underlying reason for criticizing both yeshiva and college is that neither of them teach us enough to think this way, to see the underlying structure of the world around us and engage it in a way that fulfills the potential of the human intellect and allows us to be noble, dignified, elevated beings.
There is no doubt that in terms of purpose and essence, the religious perspective has serious advantages in these intellectually muddled times. The very idea that there is a G-d teaches us to think in those terms. But I do not think that there is no secular way to think in them. On the contrary, with advances in science we now live in a world much more open to thinking in terms of design, purpose, meaning, form, and essence.
That, whimsically, is my explanation.
Tzvi, while your theory seems plausible, and I won’t disagree that it has it’s truth, I’m not sure there aren’t simpler reasons. I for one still strongly suspect that Hevria’s readership doesn’t include many hard-core Yeshiva guys (many who’ve attended Yeshiva, yes, but die-hard fans? No.).
Additionally, you might wish to explore another difference: there exists a militancy in the secular world that does not in the Yeshiva Frum world. (I speak not of practicing ultra-orthodox vs non-practicing, but of the world view and perspective of those having grown up in a completely shielded, purely religious environment vs those having grown up with outside influences.)
Simply put, the FFB’s of whom I speak declined to engage with the issue becaise they don’t engage with many issues at all, believing anyways that the vast majority of the world is so very different from them that not merely having given up on the prospect of changing what is “wrong with the world” or someone else’s belief, further, never contemplated attempting to change it. It’s completely natural and expected for Yeshiva’s to be bashed and critiqued, rightly or wrongly, and as a FFB, I wouldn’t lift a finger to counter it. It’s OK. I’m bemused and mildly frustrated or worried by your views expressed, but that’s totally, perfectly normal.
I find a very different reaction with my not-too-into-Yeshiva friends and non-FFB friends…. They really are ticked off, some even outraged, by criticism of their prized hobbies, obsessions, or opinion on what light to be…. and they shure will right that wrong!
So militant, so aggressive. And then we are the closed-minded…
Lest anyone counter with: “You are writing now… so that can’t be it!” You’re right, bit when I read the Hevria article I didn’t respond at all – not a comment, despite having practically written a point by point rebuttel in prosaic prose continuing with a full throated defense of Yeshiva and utter condemnation for college on different grounds. (without having attended it, the horror!)
And yet, me, and I suspect many others with a similar background and upringing, wouldn’t comment.
It’s more than cultural or sociological – there are philosophical underpinnings, even religious ones, that have molded an outlook that subconsciously discourages it.