Comments on: 10 Atheist Arguments I Like (part 2) https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/ Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:18:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Tzvi Kilov https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/#comment-54 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:18:25 +0000 https://notajungle.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-54 In reply to LS.

I mean, fair enough. That’s really the point of these articles — that unless you engage and really think, the G-d you worship really *is* like the G-d the atheist doesn’t believe in, and that’s a problem!

Just as I am engaging with “bad” atheist “arguments,” I would never begrudge an atheist to engage with silly things theists say; indeed I am familiar with those things and they annoy me.

(There is also the point to be made, by the way, that I don’t necessarily agree that all there is to know about G-d is rational per se. But I do believe that the rational arguments for His existence at least are valid. Some of the more childish or silly things that people say about G-d are actually *true*, in some ways and from other perspectives, but for someone who actually thinks they have to do a lot of acrobatics to see it that way. =D The idea that G-d has a body, for example, is antithetical to everything I’ve written here, but people think it is so because of what it says in the Bible. There are ways of reconciling the two, obviously, but I’m not sure how much patience an atheist would have for it.)

]]>
By: LS https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/#comment-53 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:23:39 +0000 https://notajungle.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-53 For the deep-thinking theist, who spent years of intense study plunging the depths of their faith’s greatest thinkers, perhaps G*d is more like Euclid than he is like the tooth fairy. I don’t concede the point, but I’ll grant the assumption for the sake of discussion.

But for the work-a-day man of G*d who fills their time with work and family. Who teach their children about G*d because that’s what everyone agrees is good and proper.

How different are G*d and the tooth fairy for them?

]]>
By: Tzvi Kilov https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/#comment-52 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:51:06 +0000 https://notajungle.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-52 In reply to Mendel.

Totally agree.

]]>
By: Tzvi Kilov https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/#comment-51 Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:50:48 +0000 https://notajungle.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-51 In reply to ericlinuskaplan.

No, but it’s on my list.

]]>
By: Mendel https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/#comment-50 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:04:29 +0000 https://notajungle.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-50 To many athiests, the scientific and logical arguments for god have become so outdated and sort of meaningless to the point where to believe in a deity is indeed in a sense quite similar to belief in a tooth fairy.
And at the same time, if you look at the popular conception and even portrayal of god to the masses by the cloth in the big 3 monotheistic religions, it is so downright silly that the comparison to the tooth fairies and spaghetti monsters becomes quite accurate.

]]>
By: ericlinuskaplan https://www.notajungle.com/2015/12/27/10-atheist-arguments-i-like-part-2/#comment-49 Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:47:38 +0000 https://notajungle.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-49 have you read Hume’s Dialogues on Natural Religion?

]]>